Proposed-site record
The July 2025 city staff report names Deep Meadow Ventures as petitioner. WFYI identified Google through public records; Mirror Indy reports withdrawal of the rezoning proposal on September 22, 2025. Future resubmission or relocation remains unresolved.
This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.
The July 2025 city staff report identifies Deep Meadow Ventures as petitioner. WFYI connects Google to the proposal through public records; Mirror Indy reports its September 2025 withdrawal. These sources do not disclose facility-specific workloads.
Google's involvement does not establish AI or cloud use, customers, hardware or workload capacity. The historical staff report requested power-supply documentation; it is not evidence of current utility capacity. Withdrawal does not establish permanent abandonment.
Sources reviewed; workload unresolved · Reviewed 2026-09-08Training/inference: unknown · class: unknownIndianapolis Department of Metropolitan Development: Staff report: Deep Meadow Ventures, cases 2025-CZN-814 / 2025-CVR-814WFYI: Previously unnamed company behind proposed Indy data center named in new documentsMirror Indy: Southsiders prevail in fight against Google data centerSource leads point to attached records or reporting. They still need field-level review before being treated as verified evidence.
Source lead: reporting said the proposal could have received local and state tax incentives. Because the rezoning was withdrawn, incentive records should be tracked as historical or reopened only if the project returns.
Source lead: residents and reporting raised water-use, groundwater, and environmental concerns during the rezoning fight. Google later withdrew the rezoning proposal, so any revived project should be rechecked from current city and utility records.
Source lead: reporting tied the proposal to a large campus and utility-cost concerns, but Google withdrew the rezoning request before final council approval. Interconnection or ratepayer records should be treated as historical unless the project returns.
No fuel-cell or Bloom Energy source is attached to this project yet.
Confirmed NDA
Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.
These links are the current public trail for this record. Treat broad dataset links as leads; local documents and reporting carry more weight.