Proposed-site record
Media Monitoring lead with medium location confidence. Use the linked sources to verify status, public money, NDA/secrecy, water, and power details before treating this as a fully documented local record.
This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.
No source-backed workload, customer, hardware, or training/inference allocation is attached to this record yet.
Workload classification remains unknown in the reviewed record.Source leads point to attached records or reporting. They still need field-level review before being treated as verified evidence.
Source dataset project_cost field reports $3 billion; public funding records still need local review.
Source reviewed September 9, 2026: TigerDC's project page describes the proposed facility as LEED-aligned but does not publish a water source, withdrawal, consumption, cooling, service, or wastewater quantity. The dataset's closed-loop label remains an unverified design lead, and the project was reported withdrawn from Spartanburg County in February 2026.
Source reviewed September 9, 2026: TigerDC's project page described up to 100 MW for Phase I and up to 250 MW total only if a future expansion were pursued; Data Center Dynamics reported the project was withdrawn from Spartanburg County on February 27, 2026. These are historical proposal/power-plan figures, not approved, energized, generation, or data-center IT-load capacity; the dataset's 100-500 MW range remains unreconciled context.
No fuel-cell or Bloom Energy source is attached to this project yet.
No NDA reported
Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.
These links are the current public trail for this record. Treat broad dataset links as leads; local documents and reporting carry more weight.