Proposed-site record

Lakeland Equity Group Data Center

Media Monitoring lead with high location confidence. Use the linked sources to verify status, public money, NDA/secrecy, water, and power details before treating this as a fully documented local record.

Blocked or pausedconfirmedHigh concern

Site Snapshot

Location
Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Operator / sponsor
Unknown operator
Status / stage
Blocked or paused · blocked / paused
Scale
150 MW reported; Hyperscale (100-999 MW); 300,000 sq ft; 35 acres
Reported project context; confirm whether any MW figure is requested, approved, energized, IT load, generation, or ultimate buildout before comparing it with another record.Capacity reading: Project-scale context · MW type not established · Proposed floor area · Site area

Compute Workload

This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.

Undisclosed / unknownUnknown

NEOtrans reports Lakeland Equity Group's proposed $1.6 billion, 150 MW Cleveland hyperscale campus and the developer's responses on power and cooling. Data Center Dynamics reports the city rejected the permit and that the proposed end user remained unidentified. WUSF reports Lakeland's Project Swan applicant withdrew from a June 2026 review meeting but that the city considered the project active and under review; a July 2026 follow-up records Lakeland utility officials discussing the review and a proposed 12-month pause for large-load customers. The reviewed sources do not disclose a facility workload, hardware or training/inference split.

Lakeland Equity Group is the developer/proponent; the end user is not identified. WUSF's June and July 2026 reports distinguish a withdrawn review meeting from withdrawal of the active project. Lakeland's August 3 ordinance applies the 12-month moratorium to pending applications without a final development order, including development and utility approvals, but does not decide the project's eventual land-use status or disclose workload. The reported 150 MW is proposed IT/project context, not a workload allocation, and the closed-loop cooling description does not establish workload type, hardware or training/inference.

Sources reviewed; workload unresolved · Reviewed 2026-09-09Training/inference: unknown · class: unknownNEOtrans: More details emerge on Cleveland data centerData Center Dynamics: $1.6bn data center plan rejected in Cleveland, OhioWUSF: Still active: Lakeland issues correction, clarification on proposed data center statusWUSF: ‘Take a breath’: Experts weigh in on data center moratorium in LakelandCity of Lakeland: Legal notice: Moratorium business impact estimateCity of Lakeland: Ordinance 26-018 — temporary moratorium on data centers and large-load customers

Water

Source review September 9, 2026: Cleveland's moratorium findings describe large standalone data centers as potentially significant water and infrastructure users, but the reviewed project sources do not disclose Lakeland's water source, cooling method, withdrawal, or wastewater capacity.

Power

Source review September 9, 2026: reporting identifies Lakeland's rejected proposal as a 150 MW, three-building campus. Cleveland's July 2026 moratorium pauses review and permits for new standalone data centers through October 16, 2026; it does not establish a utility agreement, requested load, energized capacity, generation, or data-center IT load for this project.

Bloom / Fuel Cells

No fuel-cell or Bloom Energy source is attached to this project yet.

NDA / Secrecy

No NDA reported

Missing NDA / secrecyFields with source leads: Public money, Water, Power
Discuss this project

Community Discussion

Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.

Start Project Thread

Sources and Leads

These links are the current public trail for this record. Treat broad dataset links as leads; local documents and reporting carry more weight.