High-priority Maryville / Nodaway County proposal. Local public minutes show county, City of Maryville, and Public Water Supply District No. 1 coordination, legal-services discussion, Sunshine/open-records activity, and public concern over water and scale. Keep under review until primary developer, utility, water, and incentive documents are attached.
ProposedconfirmedHigh concern
Site Snapshot
Location
Maryville, Nodaway County, Missouri
Operator / sponsor
ReLoad
Status / stage
Proposed · utility / power
Scale
Hyperscale (100-999 MW)
Reported project context; confirm whether any MW figure is requested, approved, energized, IT load, generation, or ultimate buildout before comparing it with another record.Capacity reading: Project-scale context · MW type not established
Compute Workload
This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.
Undisclosed / unknownUnknown
No source-backed workload, customer, hardware, or training/inference allocation is attached to this record yet.
Workload classification remains unknown in the reviewed record.
Data Fields
Source leads point to attached records or reporting. They still need field-level review before being treated as verified evidence.
Source lead: dataset project_cost field reports $4 billion; Nodaway County minutes show discussion of joint legal services among the county, City of Maryville, and Public Water Supply District No. 1, with the commission committing up to $10,000 toward legal services. Incentive, abatement, land, MOU, and infrastructure-cost records still need review.
Source lead: Nodaway County Commission minutes state water consumption would rely on water provided by the City of Maryville. Water demand, cooling method, withdrawal, sewer, and wastewater records still need review.
Source lead: Nodaway County Commission minutes reference Evergy data-center facts and FAQs and Evergy's Large Load Power Service in connection with the proposed data center. Utility service, interconnection, tariff, and ratepayer records still need review.
Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.