Proposed-site record

Project Peninsula

Project Peninsula remains a high-priority Solon Township/Cedar Springs proposal with an NDA, a reported 1 GW utility-development context, and water/sewer planning discussions. Current sources improve the boundary between project claims and statewide utility policy but do not establish final service quantities, approved or energized capacity, data-center IT load, customer allocation, or public funding.

ProposedconfirmedHigh concern

Site Snapshot

Location
Cedar Springs, Kent County, Michigan
Operator / sponsor
Venerly LLC?
Status / stage
Proposed · approval / land-use
Scale
Unknown; 800,000 sq ft; 800 acres
Reported project context; confirm whether any MW figure is requested, approved, energized, IT load, generation, or ultimate buildout before comparing it with another record.Capacity reading: Project-scale context · Proposed floor area · Site area

Compute Workload

This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.

Undisclosed / unknownUnknown

No source-backed workload, customer, hardware, or training/inference allocation is attached to this record yet.

Workload classification remains unknown in the reviewed record.

Data Fields

Source leads point to attached records or reporting. They still need field-level review before being treated as verified evidence.

Public Money

Source reviewed September 9, 2026: the public-record timeline reports a proposed $20,000 escrow for project-related water/sewer engineering, legal, and consulting costs and separately notes The Right Place placemaking support involving Cedar Springs. These are reported project/community arrangements, not confirmed public subsidy or spending; the dataset's $1 billion remains proposed investment context. Consumers Energy's March 2026 policy is statewide cost-allocation context, not a project-specific payment record.

Water

Source reviewed September 9, 2026: the current public-record timeline reports proposed water/sewer infrastructure discussions, including a draft $20,000 escrow for engineering, legal, and consulting costs tied to a possible service extension. It also reports local capacity and PFAS concerns, but no executed service quantity, withdrawal permit, cooling disclosure, or wastewater capacity; the escrow is a project-cost arrangement, not public spending.

Power

Source reviewed September 9, 2026: the current public-record timeline attributes a 1 GW data-center utility-development context to Consumers Energy and says the project was still working through local zoning as of July 28, 2026. Consumers Energy's separate customer-protection policy says large users must pay required infrastructure costs, but does not approve or quantify this project. The 1 GW remains proposal/utility context, not approved, energized, generation, or data-center IT-load capacity; interconnection and tariff records remain open.

Bloom / Fuel Cells

No fuel-cell or Bloom Energy source is attached to this project yet.

Core tracking fields have source leads attachedFields with source leads: NDA / secrecy, Public money, Water, Power
Discuss this project

Community Discussion

Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.

Start Project Thread

Sources and Leads

These links are the current public trail for this record. Treat broad dataset links as leads; local documents and reporting carry more weight.