Project Peninsula remains a high-priority Solon Township/Cedar Springs proposal with an NDA, a reported 1 GW utility-development context, and water/sewer planning discussions. Current sources improve the boundary between project claims and statewide utility policy but do not establish final service quantities, approved or energized capacity, data-center IT load, customer allocation, or public funding.
ProposedconfirmedHigh concern
Site Snapshot
Location
Cedar Springs, Kent County, Michigan
Operator / sponsor
Venerly LLC?
Status / stage
Proposed · approval / land-use
Scale
Unknown; 800,000 sq ft; 800 acres
Reported project context; confirm whether any MW figure is requested, approved, energized, IT load, generation, or ultimate buildout before comparing it with another record.Capacity reading: Project-scale context · Proposed floor area · Site area
Compute Workload
This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.
Undisclosed / unknownUnknown
No source-backed workload, customer, hardware, or training/inference allocation is attached to this record yet.
Workload classification remains unknown in the reviewed record.
Data Fields
Source leads point to attached records or reporting. They still need field-level review before being treated as verified evidence.
Source reviewed September 9, 2026: the public-record timeline reports a proposed $20,000 escrow for project-related water/sewer engineering, legal, and consulting costs and separately notes The Right Place placemaking support involving Cedar Springs. These are reported project/community arrangements, not confirmed public subsidy or spending; the dataset's $1 billion remains proposed investment context. Consumers Energy's March 2026 policy is statewide cost-allocation context, not a project-specific payment record.
Source reviewed September 9, 2026: the current public-record timeline reports proposed water/sewer infrastructure discussions, including a draft $20,000 escrow for engineering, legal, and consulting costs tied to a possible service extension. It also reports local capacity and PFAS concerns, but no executed service quantity, withdrawal permit, cooling disclosure, or wastewater capacity; the escrow is a project-cost arrangement, not public spending.
Source reviewed September 9, 2026: the current public-record timeline attributes a 1 GW data-center utility-development context to Consumers Energy and says the project was still working through local zoning as of July 28, 2026. Consumers Energy's separate customer-protection policy says large users must pay required infrastructure costs, but does not approve or quantify this project. The 1 GW remains proposal/utility context, not approved, energized, generation, or data-center IT-load capacity; interconnection and tariff records remain open.
Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.