High-priority Oldham County proposal from Western Hospitality Partners. Local reporting documents the original 267-acre, 600 MW proposal, community opposition, and a later relocation/downsize; the second-version row should stay under review until current application, capacity, water, and utility documents are attached.
ProposedconfirmedHigh concern
Site Snapshot
Location
La Grange, Oldham County, Kentucky
Operator / sponsor
WHP
Status / stage
Proposed · utility / power
Scale
Hyperscale (100-999 MW); 2,500,000 sq ft
Reported project context; confirm whether any MW figure is requested, approved, energized, IT load, generation, or ultimate buildout before comparing it with another record.Capacity reading: Project-scale context · MW type not established · Proposed floor area
Compute Workload
This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.
Undisclosed / unknownUnknown
No source-backed workload, customer, hardware, or training/inference allocation is attached to this record yet.
Workload classification remains unknown in the reviewed record.
Data Fields
Source leads point to attached records or reporting. They still need field-level review before being treated as verified evidence.
Source lead: reporting describes a claimed multibillion-dollar investment and expected county tax revenue, while Kentucky has a statewide data-center equipment tax exemption framework. Project-specific state incentive approval, local abatement, infrastructure-cost, and development-agreement records still need review.
Source lead: reporting on the original Project Lincoln proposal identifies access to Harrods Creek and water as siting factors, but public water-demand, cooling, withdrawal, and wastewater records for the relocated second-version site still need review.
Source lead: LPM reported the original Oldham County proposal would use 600 MW and sought proximity to LG&E high-voltage power lines; DCD later reported the project was relocated and downsized. Updated utility, interconnection, capacity, tariff, and ratepayer records for the second-version site still need review.
Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.