Media Monitoring lead with public Russell municipal due-diligence records. The former AK Steel site is described near Russell/Ashland in Boyd County; the existing Westwood label is retained pending exact municipal-boundary reconciliation, as are unresolved public money, water, and power details.
ProposedconfirmedMedium concern
Site Snapshot
Location
Westwood, Boyd County, Kentucky
Operator / sponsor
Rubix
Status / stage
Proposed · approval / land-use
Scale
2000 MW reported; Mega campus (>1,000 MW); 450 acres
Reported project context; confirm whether any MW figure is requested, approved, energized, IT load, generation, or ultimate buildout before comparing it with another record.Capacity reading: Project-scale context · MW type not established · Site area
Compute Workload
This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.
Undisclosed / unknownUnknown
No source-backed workload, customer, hardware, or training/inference allocation is attached to this record yet.
Workload classification remains unknown in the reviewed record.
Data Fields
Source leads point to attached records or reporting. They still need field-level review before being treated as verified evidence.
Water source, cooling method, withdrawal permits, and wastewater impacts need local sourcing.
Power
Sources reviewed September 9, 2026: Russell's answered municipal due-diligence questionnaire and Mayor Simpson's July 10 letter identify the former AK Steel/Ashland Works brownfield as the proposed site and describe Russell's involvement; Data Center Dynamics reports up to 2 GW across eight proposed buildings and says power sourcing was not confirmed. The city's documents and reporting place the site near Russell/Ashland, while the dataset's Westwood label is not retained as a settled municipal location. The 2,000 MW remains proposed project-scale context, not confirmed requested, approved, energized, IT-load, generation, or ultimate-buildout capacity.
Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.