Proposed-site record

Prologis

Media Monitoring lead with high location confidence. Use the linked sources to verify status, public money, NDA/secrecy, water, and power details before treating this as a fully documented local record.

Blocked or pausedconfirmedHigh concern

Site Snapshot

Location
Leesburg, Kosciusko County, Indiana
Operator / sponsor
Unknown operator
Status / stage
Blocked or paused · blocked / paused
Scale
Hyperscale (100-999 MW); 550 acres
Reported project context; confirm whether any MW figure is requested, approved, energized, IT load, generation, or ultimate buildout before comparing it with another record.Capacity reading: Project-scale context · MW type not established · Site area

Compute Workload

This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.

Undisclosed / unknownUnknown

Data Center Dynamics, InkFreeNews and Kosciusko County's May 6, 2025 meeting record report that Prologis sought rezoning for a proposed data center near Leesburg and that the county commissioners denied the request. The reviewed sources identify development and site context but no tenant, operator, workload, hardware or training/inference disclosure.

Prologis is the petitioner/developer, not a confirmed compute operator or customer. The 550-acre site, transmission-line access, projected investment and 300 jobs are proposal context, not workload capacity. The county record corroborates the rezoning denial; that denial does not establish a future or operating workload.

Sources reviewed; workload unresolved · Reviewed 2026-09-09Training/inference: unknown · class: unknownInkFreeNews / Times-Union: County Commissioners Say ‘No’ To Rezoning For Data CenterData Center Dynamics: Prologis data center proposal in Kosciusko County, Indiana, deniedKosciusko County: Kosciusko County Commissioners meeting record — Prologis rezoning denial

Data Fields

Source leads point to attached records or reporting. They still need field-level review before being treated as verified evidence.

NDA / secrecyMissing / needs review
Public moneySource lead attached
WaterMissing / needs review
PowerMissing / needs review

Public Money

Source dataset project_cost field reports $10 billion; public funding records still need local review.

Water

Water source, cooling method, withdrawal permits, and wastewater impacts need local sourcing.

Power

Power demand, utility service, interconnection, and ratepayer exposure need separate sourcing.

Bloom / Fuel Cells

No fuel-cell or Bloom Energy source is attached to this project yet.

NDA / Secrecy

No NDA reported

Missing NDA / secrecy, Water, PowerFields with source leads: Public money
Discuss this project

Community Discussion

Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.

Start Project Thread

Sources and Leads

These links are the current public trail for this record. Treat broad dataset links as leads; local documents and reporting carry more weight.