Proposed-site record
Media Monitoring lead with medium location confidence. Use the linked sources to verify status, public money, NDA/secrecy, water, and power details before treating this as a fully documented local record.
This panel tracks what the facility is for without assuming that every project is AI training, inference, or cloud capacity.
No source-backed workload, customer, hardware, or training/inference allocation is attached to this record yet.
Workload classification remains unknown in the reviewed record.Source leads point to attached records or reporting. They still need field-level review before being treated as verified evidence.
No public funding record attached yet. Local subsidy, tax-abatement, land, bond, and utility records need follow-up.
Source review September 9, 2026: the reviewed city and county rezoning materials do not disclose a water source, cooling method, withdrawal permit, wastewater capacity, or operating-use quantity. Those remain unresolved.
Source review September 9, 2026: the city described a proposed greenfield Logistix data center, while later reporting described a rescinded city rezoning and a county rezoning path. The dataset's 300 MW remains proposed project-scale context, not confirmed requested, approved, energized, generation, or data-center IT-load capacity; the dataset's 833-acre and later 154.92-acre site descriptions are not reconciled.
No fuel-cell or Bloom Energy source is attached to this project yet.
No NDA reported
Start a moderated thread for local questions, meeting notes, public-records coordination, or context that should not be treated as verified evidence yet.
These links are the current public trail for this record. Treat broad dataset links as leads; local documents and reporting carry more weight.